Special report: Assad's chemical and biological weapons

30 July 2012

Following Syria's threats to deploy Chemical and Biological Weapons, defence analyst Anthony Tucker-Jones assesses President Assad's deadly arsenal

Syria has long been suspected of possessing Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) with reports suggesting the country has the largest chemical and biological weapons arsenal in the Arab world.

Its failure to sign either the Chemical or Biological Weapons conventions indicated guilt, but the Syrian Foreign Ministry's recent threat to use them against external aggressors is a clear confession.

It has been alleged that the Syrian Army used chemical weapons during the siege of Baba Amr, in the city of Homs last year. Civilian casualties complained of memory loss, nerve damage, muscle pain and hair loss. Rebels have captured chemical protection kit from the Syrian Army.

US intelligence reports saying the Syrian military was moving chemical and biological weapons (CBW) stocks to safeguard them from falling into the hands of the Free Syria Army (FSA), led Israel to warn it would take pre-emptive action to stop groups like Hezbollah or al-Qaida getting hold of such weapons.

Washington has also reportedly conducted talks with Amman about Jordanian Special Forces securing Syria's biological and chemical weapons facilities should they come under threat.

Security at the Homs chemical weapons production facility and the Khan Abu Shamat storage depot have been an ongoing cause for concern. Likewise, Scud missiles at Al Safir could launch a surprise chemical attack on Israel.

"All these types of weapons are in storage and under the direct supervision of the Syrian armed forces and will never be used unless Syria is exposed to external aggression," warned Jihad Makdissi, a Syrian Foreign Ministry spokesman in response to Israel's statement. He also clarified that they would not be used against the Syrian people, but few remain convinced as President Bashar al-Assad's beleaguered regime struggles to pacify the rebellion.

It could be argued, however, that the Syrian government's words have been misrepresented. Syria's WMD are intended to give it strategic parity with Israel's nuclear weapons – they are designed to deter Israel ever resorting to such measures. Ergo they are intended to stop foreign intervention, not necessarily or explicitly UN or NATO forces.

Chemical Warfare
Assad's considerable WMD arsenal includes chemical weapons such as blister agent mustard gas and nerve agents Sarin, Tabun and VX produced in facilities at Cerin, Hama, Homs, Latakia and Palmyra.

Mustard gas is harmful as both a liquid and a vapour. It destroys skin tissue, attacks the eyes, respiratory tract and moist areas of the body and the horrific blistering of the skin it causes can resemble first-degree burns. Iraq used it during the Iran-Iraq war to some effect.

The G and V-series nerve agents, derived from phosphorous, are all viscous liquids, deadly to man and wildlife as they fatally block then paralyse respiratory and voluntary muscular action.

Most notably, Iraq used Tabun (GA), which is colourless to brown giving off an almond-like smell, against Iran during the 1980s. Sarin, known as GB, is a phosphoryl fluoride that is more toxic and volatile than Tabun. Depending on its purity it is anything from colourless to black. Both were first produced by Germany during World War II.

The V-series agents were discovered by the British chemical industry in the 1950s while researching organophosphorus insecticides. Syria's VX formula is likely to be based on the Russian 'Vx', which is a colourless liquid with no obvious smell. It is much more effective through contact with the skin than by vapour absorption.

Russian Vx is believed to be 10 times more volatile than American produced VX.

Bio-Warfare
Syria has also long been suspected of having a Biological weapons programme – there are at least 20 agents that Damascus could have weaponised, primarily bacterial and virus-based.

Syria's biological weapon of choice is believed to be Anthrax. However, work has also been conducted on aflotoxin, botulinium, camelpox, cholera, plague, ricin, smallpox and tularaemia. In the past Syria's bio-warfare programme has been described as 'very advanced'.

The mortality rate for untreated pulmonary Anthrax is almost 100 per cent, while viral haemorrhagic fevers such as Ebola have a fatality rate of 50 to 90 per cent. Likewise mortality for cholera can be as high as 50 per cent.

Botulinium toxin A is one of the most poisonous substances known to man and is a thousand times more toxic than VX – but is really only effective in sabotaging water or food supplies.

Assad could lash out
The Syrian military could deliver its CBW arsenal by aircraft, artillery or Scud and SS-21 ballistic missiles as well as naval cruise and coastal defence missiles.

Reportedly a Syrian chemical weapons plant suffered an accident in 2007 which caused 15 fatalities and left 50 injured. This happened during tests to weaponise a Scud missile with mustard gas. Among the injured were Iranian missile technicians.

As a last desperate measure Assad could now order the use of chemical weapons to terrorise the Free Syrian Army or even strike Israel to distract attention abroad.

Certainly Israel fears that President Assad's regime could lash out in an attempt to widen the conflict.

In the meantime intelligence analysts are keeping a close watch on the movements of the Syrian Army's BRDM-2RKh armoured cars, which offer protection from chemical weapons. Their presence on the battlefield could signal an imminent chemical attack.

HAVE YOUR SAY



(NOT DISPLAYED)


YOUR COMMENT WILL BE APPROVED BY A MODERATOR BEFORE IT IS ADDED TO 'YOUR SAY'

HTML CODE IS NOT PERMITTED.

30 July 2012

If the Syrians have successfully weaponised viruses like smallpox and ebola, this strongly suggests that they have been given substantial technical assistance by the Russians. To produce these viruses in quantity and turn them into storable biological agents requires considerable technological know how, as does the development of effective means of disseminating these agents. It is known that Russian scientists have assisted the Iranian regime with it's biological weapons programme.


J. Southworth - University of Hull

30 July 2012

The last thing Assad's regime is going to do is attack Israel and make their defeat a certainty.
Jeremy - Newcastle

30 July 2012

Jeremy - Newcastle

Actually the reverse is true, by attacking Israel the rebels become an ally of Israel which would see them isolated by their fellow Arabs. Could Qatar or Saudi Arabia ally themselves to Israel? I think not.

However even if the rebels win they are a disparate group and so we would have no idea who would take control of these weapons. This could mean intervention perhaps with SF's to secure and remove them.
Graham - High Wycombe

30 July 2012

It has been ALLEGED.... Syria has also long been SUSPECTED...Syria's biological weapon of choice is BELIEVED to be....REPORTEDLY a Syrian chemical weapons plant.... Assad COULD now order....Israel fears that President Assad's regime COULD lash out...

Lots and lots of innuendo, rumour and speculation: very little fact. Let's cast our minds back to the invasion of Iraq and the dishonest tales about WMD that were circulated by Blair's government and others in an attempt to justify it.

"Its failure to sign either the Chemical or Biological Weapons conventions indicated guilt...". By the same token, then, Israel's possession of nuclear weapons must make it "guilty" as well. Who are we to proclaim that a sovereign nation's refusal to accept constraints set by foreigners on the weapons it can deploy equates to "guilt"?

"Syria's WMD are intended to give it strategic parity with Israel's nuclear weapons – they are designed to deter Israel ever resorting to such measures. Ergo they are intended to stop foreign intervention..."

Pretty much the same as our own deterrent, then. A perfectly rational stance, when you can't have your own own nuclear weapons and you're next door to the most aggressive power in the region, which clearly intends to dominate it and which does have nuclear weapons.
Stan - York

31 July 2012

Stan - York

Think you miss the point here. Nobody is saying we should use Syria's WMD as a pretext for an invasion as was used falsely in the case of Iraq. Rather the problem is that if or when the regime collapses and anarchy ensues how do we know these weapons will not fall into the hands of extremists that may target us with them.

This means we must have contingency plans to secure WMD sites and remove these weapons as a matter of our own national security in the event of anarchy and a prolonged sectarian civil war following the downfall of Assad if that happens. This is a worse case scenario but one that is quite possible and we cannot allow the deception that preceded the invasion of Iraq to cloud our judgement when our national security is genuinely under threat.
Graham - High Wycombe

01 August 2012

Stan - York
Iraq did have WMD, they used it against the Kurds and Iran and as late as 2007 I was involved with the disposal of Iraqi Nerve Agent Warheads that had been handed in.

The fact they had WMD was not in doubt, it was the "able to strike western Europe with it in 1 hour" was the lie told to us by the Americans and our own government.
Rob - Telford