UK must learn reconstruction lessons
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Britain must better coordinate its post-conflict military and reconstruction efforts, taking a "comprehensive approach" to reconstruction and counterinsurgency efforts, according to a defence select committee report.
The report calls for the UK to learn the lessons from complex operations in Afghanistan and the heavily criticised post-conflict situation in Iraq, and says many have had to be re-learned from Bosnia, Kosovo and even Malaya.
It recommends a "comprehensive approach" to reconstruction to help UK forces 'make a better peace' in conflict zones. The approach requires the Ministry of Defence, the Foreign Office (FCO) and the Department for International Development (DFID) to coordinate military and reconstruction efforts from the "earliest stages", with the Prime Minister taking overall responsibility for the efforts.
"At the start of operations like these, the government should formally announce what government departments are to have what responsibilities," said James Arbuthnot MP, chairman of the defence select committee. "We would want to see leadership, clear objectives, a defined end state, strategy, tactics and details of the nature of civilian and military personnel required."
"Communication is a key component of the use of the comprehensive approach and any strategy must include plans for conveying the strategic intent of the mission to local nationals and also to the British public in an informative but fair and balanced way."
The committee said the recently formed Stabilisation Unit (owned by DFID, the FCO and the MoD) should maintain a capacity to deploy significant numbers of personnel for post-conflict reconstruction and to ensure that knowledge and skills gained in Iraq and Afghanistan are retained and built on.
The report also encourages government to find better ways to draw on the expertise of NGOs without compromising the effectiveness and safety of aid workers on the ground.
Shadow Defence Secretary Dr Liam Fox welcomed the report, saying: "One of the greatest failures of the Labour government is its failure to plan for the aftermath of the fall of Saddam Hussein. But while we accept that lessons are being learned, the report highlights that more needs to be done in developing a truly comprehensive and coherent approach for Afghanistan.
"We need proper leadership across Whitehall," he said. "That is why the Conservatives will create a National Security Council to get Whitehall on a war footing."
HAVE YOUR SAY
i read this with interest.from a laymans point of view my reply is CRAP CRAP CRAP- / i sometimes wonder just who's side these people are on..they quote bosnia-kosovo and even malaya..poss kenya.. now im no expert and other may think that im compleatly wrong..but an opinion is an opinion.
1, the british had control in bosnia.2, the same in kosovo and malaya,
2, iraq and afgan is controlled and influenced by the Americans.
now im not saying we are perfect..
but it is the americans that keep killing everything that moves,,ignores advice. and uses a hammer to crack a nut. [am i wrong]
3, who's going to pay for this retraining,the goverment cant even afford bullets.
4, are they saying the brits are way down the line in terms of looking after the results of a campainge.....are they saying that the americans-russians-china-france-european countries. arabs.and all the rest are far in front of us , that we need to improve that urgently. .
may i say,,lets get this problem out of the way first. then deal with the aftermath.after, i think the british and most other civilised countrys do a damm good job under the circumstances. and should be praised not slaged of all the time.as this undermines moral...now if im wrong im sorry.
but i dont think im that far off, and no doubt people far more experienced than me will give a fair comment. thank you.
criss of herts - london
why do we have enemies and why cant we try to build an enemyless world and spend on building up economies rather than spend on military base
kvrl - hyderabad india