Fox: defence review is under way
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Defence Secretary Liam Fox has used his first day in office to launch the long-awaited strategic defence and security review (SDSR).
Speaking to ITV News, Fox said that work had already begun on the review. The Conservatives approach to the review was set out in a
feature article on Defencemanagement.com before the election.
"We desperately need a defence review which is why it will begin immediately, it will begin today (12 May)," he said. "We now need to look at the threats that this country faces and to look at the threats of the future and try to shape our armed forces and our budgets to protect Britain not only today but from what might come out of the blue at us."
The Defence Secretary said that as well as conducting the review, his priority was to ensure troops in Afghanistan were well equipped.
"We're all concerned about the political excitement here but we have to remember that in Afghanistan our armed forces are involved in a very brutal and bloody war and we have to ensure that they have everything they need to do the job that we have asked them to do in our name," he said. "So the number one priority has to be to look after our armed forces," he said.
"There will be a number of challenges because the time I spent working as a doctor with the armed forces taught me that it's not just about our frontline forces themselves, it's also about the families. And we have to pay more attention to service families and their needs as we also have to do with service veterans. I think that in this country we need to treat our veterans in the way that the best of other countries treat their veterans."
Fox also added that the coalition government arrangement with the Liberal Democrats would allow the Trident replacement programme go ahead.
"We've got a very clear agreement that we will continue with the nuclear deterrent. The liberals have said that they would like to look at what other alternatives in terms of costs of the nuclear deterrent will be. I will certainly want to scrutinise the cost of the Trident replacement programme but the ultimate responsibility is to keep Britain safe and protect the generations of the future from whatever threats may emerge in a dangerous world.
"We cannot play fast and loose with the country's security and we will not."
HAVE YOUR SAY
Oil in the Falklands. Lets hope that some brainy person does not say that all that is needed is an Air Bridge between UK-Ascension-Falklands!! An air bridge can be brought down by a number of suitably equipped ships underneath it!! Ask the question. How do we keep the missiles out of range of the Air Bridge and securely transport any large quantities of personnel and (potentially) heavy equipment (FRES SV?)??!!!
Norman - UK
Some predictable and broadly sensible stuff from Liam Fox here, but the issue he fails to discuss is whether Trident's replacement will be included in the defence review.
Where he likes it or not, Liam is going to find himself very short of money to spend on defence over the next few years, as he will be squeezed by the need to cut government spending and control the defence equipment budget, yet focus resources on Afghanistan.
It makes sense to include Trident replacement in the Defence Review to assess objectively its costs and benefits; establish whether there is likely to be a future role for it; and, most importantly, ensure that resources needed by the armed services to maintain conventional capabilities are not sucked away into the nuclear budget.
Martin Jones - London