Hammond to unveil £1bn sub reactor deal

18 June 2012

Vanguard class, submarine
A £1.1bn deal to develop next-generation reactors for the UK's nuclear deterrent submarines has been announced by Defence Secretary Philip Hammond.

Hammond revealed that Rolls-Royce's Raynesway facility in Derby would undergo a £500m refurbishment programme, while £600m would be spent producing reactors for the replacement nuclear deterrent submarines and the seventh-in-class Astute class attack submarine. The move will safeguard or create some 300 jobs.

The successor submarines will be powered by Rolls-Royce's third generation Pressurised Water Reactor, or PWR3, after a decision by former Defence Secretary Liam Fox that PWR3 technology had a "better safety outlook" than alternative options..

Speaking on BBC's Sunday Politics, current Defence Secretary Philip Hammond said: "What we're going to be announcing is a commitment to the major refurbishment of the plant at Rolls-Royce in Derby which builds these core reactors, not just for the nuclear deterrent submarines but also for our attack submarines, the Astute Class submarines.

"This is sustaining a sovereign capability in the UK and some very high-end technical skills in the UK for the next 40 or 50 years," he said.

"The government's policy is very clear. We're committed to maintaining a credible nuclear deterrent and we're placing orders now - we announced £350m a couple of weeks ago for the design work - for the long-lead items that will be necessary to deliver a successor to the Vanguard class submarines in the late 2020s.

"But the actual decision on whether to build them won't be taken until 2016 - what we're doing now is ordering the things we have to order now to give us that option."

The 2016 delay to the main gate decision was agreed as part of the government's coalition agreement, and allows time for Liberal Democrat Armed Forces Minister Nick Harvey to complete a Cabinet Office review of alternative nuclear deterrent options, which is due to report to the Prime Minister later this year.

Former Lib Dem leader Sir Menzies Campbell said the announcement did not affect or negate the review process.

"Even if there was no Trident submarine programme we would still have had to upgrade these facilities in order to ensure that the reactor cores for the Astute-class were being properly constructed and in a safe environment," he said.

HAVE YOUR SAY



(NOT DISPLAYED)


YOUR COMMENT WILL BE APPROVED BY A MODERATOR BEFORE IT IS ADDED TO 'YOUR SAY'

HTML CODE IS NOT PERMITTED..

18 June 2012

Every pound spent on Trident is a pound less for meeting the real equipment needs of our armed forces.
Steve - Liverpool

18 June 2012

What's the export potential for these reactors? I don't disagree with this decision but it seems like double standards when you compare investment here against the "off the shelf" nonsense being propogated elsewhere. I'd like to see more investment elsewhere too - in stuff we can sell abroad and bring money into the country. March of the makers rather than sputum of the spin doctors please.
Michael - Hertfordshire

18 June 2012

If the Israeli Defence Force can deploy a perfectly credible nuclear deterrent with German built diesel electric subs, why can't we?
Sean - London

18 June 2012

Trident will never be replaced anyway - the astronomical costs and / or Scottish independence will guarantee that. Most people have now grasped this - it's just a few headbangers on the looney fringe of the Conservative Party who delude themselves that the UK will remain an nuclear power.
Dave - Edinburgh

18 June 2012

Dave - Edinburgh

This is for new SSBN's to replace the Vanguard's not Trident replacement which are good till 2042. Whatever we do we will need to maintain our engineering capability in nuclear powered technology.
Graham - High Wycombe

18 June 2012

Graham - Why? See Sean's comment above.
Dave - Edinburgh

18 June 2012

Sean - London

Because everytime an Israeli boat comes up to snorkel depth to re-charge its batteries, it can be detected. It is only the lack of a credible Hunter Killer Submarine or ASW Surface vessel from any of its opponents that allow Israel this luxury.

We could not operate an effective deterrance patrol with a diesel boat I'm afraid.
Rob - Telford

19 June 2012

Dave - Edinburgh

See Rob's comment below yours.
Graham - High Wycombe