Iraq Cabinet paper release vetoed
01 August 2012
Attorney General Dominic Grieve has blocked the release of minutes from Cabinet meetings held in the run up to Iraq War in 2003.
Grieve, the only minister with access to Cabinet minutes from the previous government, used his "exceptional" veto to block a call by the Information Commissioner to release the documents.
Grieve's veto follows a similar order by Jack Straw in 2009, but he said the veto was still needed because the case for disclosure was "outweighed by the strong interest in protecting the conditions necessary for effective cabinet government and thereby encouraging high-quality decision-making at the highest level".
The arguments in favour of a veto had not "materially altered" in the years since 2009, he argued, adding that many of the MPs present at the meetings were still in Parliament or "active" in public life.
Grieve said the issue of war discussed in the meetings was "exceptionally serious" and that it remained the focus of both "domestic and international interest".
He concluded that Iraq was "very much a live political issue in its own right" with links to the "overall security situation in the Middle East and the perceived link between the terror threat to the UK and military action in Iraq".
Information Commissioner Christopher Graham will now study Grieve's "statement of reasons" before reporting to Parliament in September, his office said.
"He recognises, however, that the Freedom of Information Act allows for a ministerial veto, and acknowledges that this decision is consistent with that made by the previous government, which vetoed disclosure of the same information following an Information Tribunal hearing."
HAVE YOUR SAY
01 August 2012
Nothing to do with there being no WMD then and the legality of the attack!!
Can't have former PM's put into the dock can we, it would make all MP's fearful for their freedom.
JC - UK
02 August 2012
If they have nothing to hide they have nothing to fear.
So much for the "Transparency Agenda".
AlMiles - Bristol, UK
02 August 2012
JC - UK
Iraq did have WMD, the lie was Iraq's ability to hit UK targets inside an hour.
Agree with you that the legality of the attack is very questionable.
Rob - Telford
03 August 2012
Rob,
my apologies, yes they did have WMD's but as you quite rightly point out none that could treaten us at that time.
My main objection is that MP's are far to ready to send our troops off to war but then hide behind some legal ruling that stops us from knowing the truth.
JC - UK