US firm signs Falklands oil deal
07 August 2012
A US-based energy firm is to join the search for oil in waters around the Falkland Islands after signing an exploration deal with Falklands Oil and Gas Limited (FOGL).
Noble Energy will invest between $180m and $230m in gaining a 35 per cent share of the exploration licences to the south and east of the Falkland Islands in a move which is being described as signalling a possible shift in America's stated neutrality over the islands' sovereignty.
The licences cover an area of some 40,000 square kilometres, and the deal follows news that Venezuelan state oil company PDVSA is in talks with YPF, now 51 per cent controlled by Argentina, over exploration in waters near the islands.
Edison Investment Research's Ian McLelland told The Daily Telegraph that some companies with "direct exposure" to, or investments in, Latin America had avoided the Falklands because of their proximity to South America and the ongoing dispute between the UK and Argentina.
"The fact that a US company like Noble is entering the region is therefore of significance," he said.
Argentina is claiming sovereignty over the islands and demanding the UK engage in talks at the United Nations, something the British government has refused to do.
This year marks the 30th anniversary of the Falklands War, when Argentina invaded the islands only to be repelled by a British task force several months later.
During the war, America was said to have adopted a neutral position, but in June it was reported that
US President Ronald Reagan had cleared a US carrier to assist the UK in taking back the islands if necessary.
FOGL chief executive Tim Bushell said that the choice of an American firm had not been "politically motivated", but that Noble would have sought US State Department advice before investing in the Falklands.
HAVE YOUR SAY
07 August 2012
This must be great news for the islanders. Oil is a strategic asset & basis of foreign policy. I would suggest Argentina will become very careful about what it says in future, knowing that the US is now involved, after all Kirchner was courting Clinton to sympathise & while private companies can invest in what they like as it is not necessarily government policy on the agenda, with oil being a strategic asset, I would have thought the issue has gravity for foreign policy in the region...
Think of their refusal to allow vessels doing business with the Falklands access to ports; can you imagine the situation when they refuse vessels that are flagged as from the worlds' only superpower?
Laskovar - UK
07 August 2012
Of course the US want in, there's oil involved isn't there!!!!
JC - UK