Confirmed: 5,300 soldiers to go in latest army cuts
22 January 2013
The third tranche of armed forces redundancies will involve up to 5,300 soldiers but current operations in Afghanistan will not be affected, the Ministry of Defence has confirmed.
The latest round of cuts, which will not involve any Royal Navy or RAF personnel, is the most recent development in what will see the size of the army reduced to 82,000 by 2015.
General Sir Peter Wall, the chief of the general staff said the latest announcement would "present an opportunity" for some but added that many soldiers would have their service curtailed "prematurely".
Reports had indicated that the army was considering whether it could continue exemptions for those preparing to deploy to Afghanistan.
But is has now been confirmed that soldiers preparing for combat operations will still be exempt, unless they voluntarily apply.
Other groups of soldiers exempt include those that are recovering from a serious injury sustained on operations. Soldiers on combat operations and soldiers recovering from combat operations will also not be made redundant in this tranche unless they voluntarily apply.
Drawdown plans will however mean that those units liable to deploy on Herrick 19 will not be confirmed until April 2013.
The MoD added that personnel who are liable to deploy with their units to Afghanistan in autumn 2013 on the day the redundancy notices are issued will be exempt from tranche three unless they are an applicant.
"Unfortunately redundancies are unavoidable due to the size of the defence deficit that this government inherited and the consequent scale of downsizing required in the army," said Defence Secretary Philip Hammond.
"We will have smaller armed forces but they will in future be properly equipped and well funded, unlike before. These redundancies will not affect current operations in Afghanistan, where our armed forces continue to fight so bravely on this country's behalf."
General Wall added: "I fully recognise the unwelcome uncertainty and pressure for those who will be liable in the employment fields announced today.
"For some it may present an opportunity; for others it will curtail their service prematurely.
"Our aim now is to apply the process as fairly as possible and to prepare to support those individuals who are selected as they and their families' transition to civilian life."
The MoD said there was likely to be a need for a further tranche for army personnel and medical and dental personnel from the Royal Navy and the RAF. This was likely to include soldiers who were exempt due to operational exclusions in the third tranche.
HAVE YOUR SAY
22 January 2013
"Unfortunately redundancies are unavoidable due to the size of the defence deficit that this government inherited and the consequent scale of downsizing required in the army," said Defence Secretary Philip Hammond.
"We will have smaller armed forces but they will in future be properly equipped and well funded, unlike before.
Usual Piffle from Politicians.
The defence deficit is of the governments own making, since they control the purse strings. He talks like its is a natural phenomenon with no cure. Spend less on foreign aid, and put some of it to defence, for example.
The comment that in future they will be properly equipped and funded is the same as after all the previous cuts, 91, 95, 98, 2004, 2009, 2010 and in between under Labour. Just words and excuses.
Each new defence review is obsolete before its recommendations are carried out due to the next review following it, which cuts still more.
Disgrace Mr Hammond.
A proper defence review could, for example, cut the army but increase power projection services like the RN and RAF to compensate.
Daniele Mandelli - Guildford
22 January 2013
As Jim Murphy MP pointed out, it is absolutely mind-boggling that the (unelected) Prime Minister is gabbling on about "existential threat" and "generational conflict" in North Africa whilst simultaneously cutting 9000 more troops from the army (and staff from the other services)... meanwhile the "reason" for the cuts, the so-called deficit, continues to grow. Insane.
AlMiles - Bristol, uK